06-02-2010, 10:08 AM
I feel alone on an island when it comes to the subject of Dr. Ruckman.
On the one hand, so many people hate him and think he's a heretic and all that. If you dare mention him as a source for an idea (as I did on another forum) you come very close to getting lynched and ran off the forum.
On the flip side, if you dare say he's not perfect, has some kooky ideas, and sometime says things he shouldn't, you get slammed by his very loyal followers.
Is there no middle ground? I've listened to thousands of hours of him on tape and have several of his commentaries. My pastor graduated from his school. Yet I don't believe Dr. Ruckman is perfect, and I think he's unfortunatly shot himself in the foot with hit bombastic statements over the years to those who are KJVO.
At the same time, I think he's the best Bible teacher I've ever heard, maybe second only to Sam Gipp - a graduate of his school. I agree with about 80% of the stuff he teaches, with only one major disagreement.
Anyways, I found myself in an odd situation lately, and I thought I'd express it. On one board, I was pointing out that Dr. Ruckman wasn't as perfect as everyone there was trying to paint him out to be, while at the same time on another board I was defending Dr. Ruckman from a bunch of IFBers who were labeling him as a heretic.
Is there any middle ground???
On the one hand, so many people hate him and think he's a heretic and all that. If you dare mention him as a source for an idea (as I did on another forum) you come very close to getting lynched and ran off the forum.
On the flip side, if you dare say he's not perfect, has some kooky ideas, and sometime says things he shouldn't, you get slammed by his very loyal followers.
Is there no middle ground? I've listened to thousands of hours of him on tape and have several of his commentaries. My pastor graduated from his school. Yet I don't believe Dr. Ruckman is perfect, and I think he's unfortunatly shot himself in the foot with hit bombastic statements over the years to those who are KJVO.
At the same time, I think he's the best Bible teacher I've ever heard, maybe second only to Sam Gipp - a graduate of his school. I agree with about 80% of the stuff he teaches, with only one major disagreement.
Anyways, I found myself in an odd situation lately, and I thought I'd express it. On one board, I was pointing out that Dr. Ruckman wasn't as perfect as everyone there was trying to paint him out to be, while at the same time on another board I was defending Dr. Ruckman from a bunch of IFBers who were labeling him as a heretic.
Is there any middle ground???
